European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION TO CHECK THE EFFICACY OF THREE DIFFERENT RETREATMENT ROTARY FILES YSTEMS IN THE REMOVAL OF FILLING MATERIAL FROM THE ROOT CANAL DURING ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT– ANINVITROCBCTSTUDY

Gargee Karmveer*, Manu Bansal, Sangeeta Nawal, Gitanjali Singh, Shrishti Kumawat and Simran Utwal

ABSTRACT

Aim of the study: Effective debridement and cleansing of the root canal system, along with three-dimensional canal sealing, are essential for the potency of endodontic treatment. The removal of root canal filling materials has been accomplished with NiTi devices. The primary goals were to assess how well three rotary retreatment file systems removed gutta-percha and Bio C(Angelus), a bioceremic sealer, from root canal walls and use Cone Beam Computed Tomography to contrast the proportion of residual obturating material in the root canal walls in terms of volume following removal utilizing ProTaper, Neoendo, and Endostar RE retreatment files. Methodology: Sixty extracted single-rooted teeth were selected. At CEJ, they were decoronated. BioC (Angelus) Bioceremic sealer and gutta-percha were used to obturate the root canals. Based on retreatment files— the ProTaper Retreatment File, the Neoendo Retreatment File, and the Endostar RE endo Retreatment File— they were split up into 4 groups (n=15). One was a control group, and the other three were experimental groups. Solvents such as xylene were used. Cone Beam Computed Tomography was utilized for the evaluation of the remaining filling materials. Result: In this investigation None of the groups removed all of the root canal filler material from the walls of the canals. ProTaper retreatment files, Endostar RE endo retreatment files, and Neoendo retreatment files were found to differ significantly from one another. (p < 0.05) In comparison to the other groups, Group 3 (Endostar RE endo) had the most amount of gutta-percha eliminated, as seen by its significantly lower post-treatment mean rank. Conclusion: In root canal system the gutta- percha and Bio C sealer had not been entirely eliminated by any of the retreatment files or solvents. The Endostar RE endo retreatment file system outperformed the PTUR and Neoendo retreatment file systems among the ProTaper, Neoendo, and Endostar RE retreatment file systems.

Keywords: Retreatment Gutta-percha, ProTaper universal, Neoendo, Endostar RE endo retreatment files.