Abstract
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF TURMERIC AND GINGER AGAINST PARACETAMOL INDUCED LIVER DAMAGE IN FEMALE ALBINO RATS

Olushola Ladeji, Sangodele J. O, Chinenye Egwuonwu, Ijeoma B. Eluwa

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of the ethanol extract of Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale against paracetamol induced liver damage in female albino rats. The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into The rats were grouped into seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, seven groups (A, B, C, D, E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was E, F and G), with five rats in each group. Group A served as the normal control was given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally ( 1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control given normal saline orally (1ml/kg). Group B served as the positive control paracetamol treated group) in which the rats were treated orally with paracetamol at dose of 400mg/kg body weight for 7 days. Group C was pretreated with a standard drug, silymarin -200mg/kg plus paracetamol for 7 days. Group D and E were pretreated with turmeric extract (200mg/kg and 400mg/kg respectively) prior to paracetamol treatment. Group F and G were pretreated with ginger extract (200mg/kg and 400mg/kg respectively) prior to the administration of paracetamol simultaneously for 7 days. Paracetamol, normal saline and the extracts were administered orally, once daily. Paracetamol at 400mg/kg induced liver damage in rats, manifested by statistically increased serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin and thiobarbutiric acid reactive substances, also reduced total serum protein. Pre-treatment of rats with ethanolic extracts of Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale prior to paracetamol dosing lowered serum liver enzyme activities, bilirubin, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and increased total serum protein. It was concluded from the result that the ethanolic extracts of Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale posses hepatoprotective activity against paracetamol induced liver damage, with Curcuma longa (turmeric) having a higher potential when compared with Zingiber officinale (ginger).

Keywords: paracetamol, Zingiber officinale, thiobarbutiric, hepatoprotective.


[Full Text Article]   [Download Certificate]

Indexing

Best Article Awards

European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (EJBPS) is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.

Best Article of current issue :

Dr. Dhrubo Jyoti Sen

Download Article : Click here

News & Updation

  • EJBPS: JULY ISSUE PUBLISHED

    JULY 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on 1 JULY 2026.

  • EJBPS: New Impact Factor 2026

    EJBPS Impact Factor has been Increased from  7.482 to 8.181 for Year 2026.

  • Index Copernicus Value

    EJBPS Received Index Copernicus Value 77.3, due to High Quality Publication in EJBPS at International Level

  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.

    .

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in EJBPS coming Issue.

     

Google Scholar Index Copernicus Indian Science Publications Urlich's Periodicals Directory, Proquest, UK (In Process) Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN UDLedge Science Citation Index International Society for Research activity (ISRA) Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) InfoBase Index (In Process) SJIF Impact Factor Scholar Article Impact Factor, SAIF Universal Impact Factor CAS (A Division of American Chemical Society) USA (Under Process) Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ, Sweden, in process) CiteFactor Directory Of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI) Indian citation Index (ICI) Journal Index (JI, Under Process) Directory of abstract indexing for Journals (DAIJ) Open Access Journals (Under Process) Impact Factor Services For International Journals (IFSIJ) Cosmos Impact Factor Jour Informatics (Under Process) Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) International Innovative Journal Impact Factor (IIJIF) Science Library Index, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Global Impact Factor (GIF) (0.377) IP Indexing (IP Value 3.77) Web of Science Group (Under Process) Directory of Research Journals Indexing Scope Database Academia Academia Doi-Digital Online Identifier Doi-Digital Online Identifier ISSN National Centre Zenodo Indexing International CODEN Service, USA

UG/PG/Ph.D Research Publication

Research Scholar of UG/PG/Ph.D can Submit their Research Article/Review Article/Case Study/Short Communication for Publication in EJBPS

Downloads

Copyright From

Covering Letter

                        Author Instruction 
 

PLAGERLUM REPORT